In UAE courts, judges prize documents and objective records. Live testimony still matters, but it must sit well with messages, photos, timestamps, and any physical evidence in the file. Stress, delay, and public testimony can distort memory, so the court tests accounts through careful comparison and cross-examination.
What judges look for when stories clash
- Consistency and detail. A version that stays stable and matches other proven facts carries more weight than one that shifts after cross-examination.
- Prior statements. Earlier messages, complaints, or reports that differ from today’s story reduce credibility if the witness cannot explain the change.
- Ability to observe. Distance, lighting, timing, and any impairment affect how much weight the court gives that witness.
- Corroboration. Emails, CCTV, call logs, and medical or business records can tip a tight case.
- Motive or bias. A financial stake, a feud, or fear of blame invites caution.
- Demeanour, used carefully. Evasion hurts. Honest gaps that the witness admits can help, but demeanour alone does not decide a case.
Standards that guide the judge
- Criminal cases. The court asks whether all the evidence leaves any reasonable doubt. If the accused’s version is believable or even just raises doubt, the court must acquit.
- Civil and family cases. The claimant must persuade the judge that their version fits the records and probabilities better than the other side’s. The court may accept parts of each account if that best fits the objective proof.
A Dubai-style example
Scenario. Two employees give opposite accounts about a cash handover in a Deira shop on 2 March.
- Employee A says he handed AED 35,000 to Employee B at 7:15 pm by the till.
- Employee B denies any handover.
How the court would test it.
- Pull the CCTV for 7:00–7:30 pm.
- Check WhatsApp and POS logs for a “handover” message or end-of-day closeout.
- Compare each witness’s prior statements to HR and police.
- Probe observation: lighting, vantage point, and whether either was distracted.
- Assess motive: who stood to gain or avoid blame for a cash shortage.
If CCTV shows both men at the till at 7:14 pm and a WhatsApp “cash done” from A to B at 7:18 pm, the judge will likely accept A’s core point even if A misremembers a minor detail like the exact minute. Parts of B’s evidence may still be accepted if they fit the records.
Practical tactics for UAE litigants and counsel
- Build the record early. Preserve CCTV, POS exports, access logs, and call logs within days. Do not rely on memory.
- Lock in statements. Take dated witness notes and have witnesses review them. Later shifts will be obvious.
- Cross-examine with documents. Confront the witness with messages, photos, or attendance logs that fix time and place.
- Separate honesty from accuracy. A witness can be honest but wrong on detail. Focus on what documents settle.
- Treat small errors as small. Do not overplay trivial inconsistencies. Save court time for contradictions that matter to liability or intent.
- Explain any change. If your witness must correct an earlier point, explain why with a document or clear reason.
One question matters most: which account fits the independent evidence. Build your case so the answer is yours.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. The author assumes no responsibility or liability for actions taken based on its contents. For advice on your specific situation, consult a qualified lawyer.
Call Lawyers at +971506531334 +971558018669
https://www.lawyersuae.com
